VA Dog rules sometimes heart-breaking

 
« Previous story
Next story »
 
VA Dog rules sometimes heart-breaking

This is sort of a heart-wrenching story for anyone who is a dog-lover.  Those two pictured above are mine, and certainly not service dogs.  The black and white one, "Fenway" would probably bite or kiss everyone if he got out of the house, and the blonde one "Mosby" would push his jihad on the mailman.  But whenever I am completely stressed out, I love having them there.  They usually go one on each side and just push into me, which is both annoying and comforting. 

So imagine what  Alexis Courneen is facing in this Leo Shane Stars and Stripes article.  (For what it is worth, I would have to say that Leo is my favorite reporter in the country right now.  He really does great work.)

Alexis Courneen’s 6-year-old yellow lab Sooner is a beloved family member and the one who convinces her its safe to leave the house each day. But to the Department of Veterans Affairs, the dog is just another piece of equipment.

And a broken one at that.

The service dog just underwent his second ACL surgery this year and is rehabbing in an effort to return to his full duties. Without him, Alexis — an injured Coast Guard veteran — struggles with everyday tasks.

“He’s been a part of my healing in ways I never thought,” the 34-year-old said. “He helps with my balance and can alert bark if I’m in trouble. But he’s also given me the confidence to go out in public and try things like public speaking.

“But under VA rules, he might as well be scrap metal.”

VA officials paid for the dog's first surgery but balked at the second, even though veterinarians insist Sooner still has years of productive work ahead of him.

Earlier this year, they told Alexis that the dog should be “retired.”

After she went ahead with the surgery, officials said her family could lose all financial support for the animal from the VA, since they still question whether he’s fit for duty. That might mean a few hundred dollars in medical visits and new harnesses. Or it could mean thousands if he needs more surgery.

You should go and read the rest of the article if you have time.  Even for those of us who self-medicate with pets like my two monsters, this is kind of a tough read.  I get why dogs are under the "prosthetics" section of VA, but some common sense obviously needs to be applied here.  Even if it is just a sort of economic comparison.  Sure, a new dog might be less expensive, but can you imagine the damage this would do to Alexis?  Come on man.

Posted in the burner | 1 comment
 
« Previous story
Next story »

 

* To comment without a Facebook account, please scroll to the bottom.

Comments

As a Army Veteran (service period 1963-1966) Who has been denied VA care because of the means test.( Assets and income to high) The amount of money saved by the VA towards not honoring their commitment to me as well as thousands of others.( because of the means test.)I wish to say the VA should have the means(MONEY) to help any Veteran and the care for any animal that can help the Veteran or Veterans become well.Iam sure the Money the VA saved from not serving VETS who fail the means test is more than ample to save a animal helping to restore the wholeness of a VETERAN!

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Have a tip for us? A link that should appear here? Contact us.
News from the World of Military and Veterans Issues. Iraq and A-Stan in parenthesis reflects that the author is currently deployed to that theater.